 | | | Linux | | We have a redhat box using ldap for authentication as well as quotas in place for our users. There are a few users that have been removed from the ldap directory however their quota still exists. Thanks!
Is it possible to create LVM 's on already configured red Hat machines
without hurting any data?
Thanks
Anne
-----Original Message-----
From redhat-list-bounces@(protected) [mailto redhat-Hey all
I need to be a heretic (well maybe I dunno)... so let me put
it to you.
I have been running my own personal server for just about
forever it seems (certainly since 1993 or so) and I 'On Sun 9 Sep 2007 Ryan Golhar wrote
> I 'm running a RHEL v3 server completely up to date...
>
> I tried to edit a user 's quota (as root) using the command
> '/usr/sbin/edquota someuser ' and I gotJeff Pang wrote
>
> I saw these messages in 'dmesg ' info
>
> scsi0 ERROR on channel 0 id 3 lun 0 CDB Read (10) 00 0e ae 9f 27
> 00 00 08 00
> Info fld 0xeae9f2c Current sdd sense key MediumThanks everyone. I am looking forward to converting our office from
windows to a more intelligent solution... -)
-----Original Message-----
From Yoho Cindy
Sent Thursday September 06 2007 1 >
Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV Blaasveldstraat 162 B-2830 Willebroek
VAT BE 406.024.281 RPR Mechelen ING 310-0092504-52 IBAN BE64 3100 0925 0452 SWIFT BBRUBEBB
-----Original Message-Hello
I saw these messages in 'dmesg ' info
scsi0 ERROR on channel 0 id 3 lun 0 CDB Read (10) 00 0e ae 9f 27
00 00 08 00
Info fld 0xeae9f2c Current sdd sense key Medium Error
Additional sensI 'm running a RHEL v3 server completely up to date...
I tried to edit a user 's quota (as root) using the command
'/usr/sbin/edquota someuser ' and I got the error
edquota Can 't open quotafile /homOn 9/9/07 Anne Moore <diabeticithink@(protected) > wrote
>
> Hi All does anyone know if there is a Red Hat command/backup solution
> that
> allows taking a snap shot of the system while it 's mounted aHi All does anyone know if there is a Red Hat command/backup solution that
allows taking a snap shot of the system while it 's mounted and running in
multi-user mode? (It would be equivalent to the fsMatthew
>From Matthew Saltzman <mjs@(protected) >
>Subject Re perl irritations
>On Thu 2007-09-06 at 17 21 -0400 m.roth2006@(protected) wrote
> > The problem is that this is my firewall/router. > Why do so many of the other languages show up but not the Asian ones?
> Any suggestions on what I need to do to resolve this?
Well I figured this out in a very long and round-about way. ) AfterThanks guys. I guess I am so conditioned by software expiring to the
point of unusable after 30days that I overlooked this.
-----Original Message-----
From redhat-list-bounces@(protected)
[mailto reOn Thu 2007-09-06 at 17 21 -0400 m.roth2006@(protected) wrote
> >Date Thu 06 Sep 2007 14 06 57 -0400
> >From Matthew Saltzman <mjs@(protected) >
> >
> >On Thu 2007-09-06 at 07 43 -0500 mark wroteJason.
Have you looked here?
http //www.redhat.com/solutions/industries/developer/products/basic.html
Regards Marshall
>-----Original Message-----
>From redhat-list-bounces@(protected)
>[mailtoOn Fri Sep 07 2007 at 08 58 46AM -0700 Jason Taylor wrote
> For my own claification you have to buy at least the minimum support in
> order to get the iso 's right? I want a copy of RHEL5 but donFor my own claification you have to buy at least the minimum support in
order to get the iso 's right? I want a copy of RHEL5 but don 't want
support but the only download I can find is for beta.
--If you have 20 years of experience in the Unix world you don 't need paid
support. Just use lists like this one for awkward issues. I 've been an
Admin for about 4 years now and only had support forSteve Phillips wrote
> m.roth2006@(protected) wrote
> > > My guess is that the -devel package split goes back as far as your
> > > version.
> >
> > The problem is that this is my firewall/router. I do NOT WANHi all I have a perplexing issue with missing languages in the GDM
login screen.
A user requested that a language (Korean) be added to their RHEL4 U5
machine post install. I realize this isn 't exac
On Thu 6 Sep 2007 David Miller wrote
> In the product comparison on the Red Hat site they have some hardware and
> software limits listed for each version of RHEL. For RHEL4 & 5 workstation
> On Thu 2007-09-06 at 16 42 -0700 David Miller wrote
> In the product comparison on the Red Hat site they have some hardware
> and software limits listed for each version of RHEL. For RHEL4 & 5
In the product comparison on the Red Hat site they have some hardware
and software limits listed for each version of RHEL. For RHEL4 & 5
workstation they have a Physical CPU limit of two. Yet I ham.roth2006@(protected) wrote
> > My guess is that the -devel package split goes back as far as your
> > version.
>
> The problem is that this is my firewall/router. I do NOT WANT a gcc on it. Am I going t > CentOS rebuilds the RHEL SRPMS and removes
> trademarks according to Red Hat 's redistribution terms. Their goal is to be as
> close to 100% binary compatible with RHEL as possible. Personally I >Date Thu 06 Sep 2007 14 06 57 -0400
>From Matthew Saltzman <mjs@(protected) >
>
>On Thu 2007-09-06 at 07 43 -0500 mark wrote
> > Herta Van den Eynde wrote
> > > On 06/09/2007 mark <m.roth2006@ >Date Thu 6 Sep 2007 12 36 34 -0400
>From "Virden Larry W. " <lvirden@(protected) >
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From Ray Van Dolson
>
> > It 's basically a RH clone built from Red Hat 's own SRPM filEl Jueves 6 de Septiembre de 2007 20 21 Yoho Cindy escribi?
> Hi All
>
> I am a unix admin (HP-UX and Solaris) who is just now getting around to
> installing a linux server. (I know I know!) WOn Thu 6 Sep 2007 Yoho Cindy wrote
> I am a unix admin (HP-UX and Solaris) who is just now getting around to
> installing a linux server. (I know I know!) We are going to use
> RedHat and Free |
|
|
