 | | | Linux | | My answer yesterday was to use the kernel-smp on multiple CPUs and
multicore single CPUs. If you 're using either of these you 'll need the
kernel-smp. In the case of a single non multicore CPU us
Clark Patti wrote
> Not being a kernel expert when would one want to use kernel vs
> kernel-smp on a multi-core system?
>
> Patti Clark
> Unix System Administrator - RHCT
> Office of Scientific anTroy Knabe wrote
> No I mean a groupOfUniqueNames.
>
I think that should be ok. You would need to use the "group " method.
For each host you will have to set the pam_groupdn to the DN of the
entrThat 's a bit weird. I just checked and vim -x works on my RHEL 5 box.
Also vim -h displays the -x option. Are you sure you are not using some
other version of vim compiled locally in your system ouI am ruining rhel4 with 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp kernel. I have a problem I cant get
up2date to run. Follow is /var/log/up2date. Any help will be appreciated
[Fri Oct 12 08 43 14 2007] up2date updating loOn 11Oct2007 07 46 Michael Scully <agentscully@(protected) > wrote
| I have users who connect via ssh to run a particular application.
| For those I have their .bash_profile set to run tHello All
When quad-core processors were released a short while back I heard some
brief blurbs about how there were security issues with the shared CPU
cache memory.
So some questions
1) Did thIf you have a hyperthreaded single CPU or multiple CPUs use the
kernel-smp. The "kernel " kernel cannot use the second ID of a multicore
CPU.
Clark Patti wrote
> Not being a kernel expert when wNot being a kernel expert when would one want to use kernel vs
kernel-smp on a multi-core system?
Patti Clark
Unix System Administrator - RHCT
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
<mailto Michael Scully wrote
> Greetings
>
> I have users who connect via ssh to run a particular application.
> For those I have their .bash_profile set to run this application and exit
> when they closWe are evaluating RHEL 5 and found this
Under RHEL 3 and 4 one could do 'vi -x ' to have the file password
protected and encrypted. Under RHEL 5 this appears to be no longer
true. So what is useNo I mean a groupOfUniqueNames.
-Troy
-----Original Message-----
From redhat-list-bounces@(protected) [mailto redhat-list-bounces@(protected)] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade
Sent Thursday October 11 200Troy Knabe wrote
> So I can 't do Kerberos authentication and ldap authorization and have group based access defined by pam_groupddn??
>
If by "group " you mean POSIX group I don 't believe so.
--
You can add the mount command to /etc/rc.d/rc.local - it 's the last thing
executed on boot before giving you a login prompt.
> can you do it with the mount command after the OS is up?
>
>
> On 10/11So I can 't do Kerberos authentication and ldap authorization and have group based access defined by pam_groupddn??
-Troy
First you must have enabled LDAP authentication. If you don 't have
pam_ldapcan you do it with the mount command after the OS is up?
On 10/11/07 Mark Haney <mhaney@(protected) > wrote
> xiang wrote
> > description both hosts(one redhat 194.128.4.150 255.255.255.0 anoGreetings
I have users who connect via ssh to run a particular application.
For those I have their .bash_profile set to run this application and exit
when they close it. But I often need those saxiang wrote
> description both hosts(one redhat 194.128.4.150 255.255.255.0 another suse 194.128.4.140 255.255.255.0)are located in the same subnet.
> i 've already modified /etc/fstab anddescription both hosts(one redhat 194.128.4.150 255.255.255.0 another suse 194.128.4.140 255.255.255.0)are located in the same subnet.
i 've already modified /etc/fstab and moute -a is ok shivkaran ravidas wrote
> hello to all
>
> I am facing problems with Makefile .
> When i am running Makefile it flashibg following error
>
> /usr/bin/ld Cant not find -Xext
> Collhello to all
I am facing problems with Makefile .
When i am running Makefile it flashibg following error
/usr/bin/ld Cant not find -Xext
Collect2 ld return 1 exit error
Troy Knabe wrote
> I am using Kerberos for authentication and ldap for authorization.
> But I want to limit the ldap users who can login to the server to a
> specific group.
>
>
>
> Anyone have anEither one I only want people from the group to be able to access the server.
Thanks
-Troy
----- Original Message -----
From "mups.cp " <mups.cp@(protected) >
Date Wednesday October 10 2007 6 33 pgetent passwd returns the desired users ?
On 10/10/07 mups. cp <mups.cp@(protected) > wrote
> When you say connect you refer to local or remotely?
>
>
> On 10/10/07 Troy Knabe <knabe@(protected) > wroWhen you say connect you refer to local or remotely?
On 10/10/07 Troy Knabe <knabe@(protected) > wrote
> # Group to enforce membership of
> pam_groupdn cn troy_test ou Groups dc company dc com ## Y#%PAM-1.0
# This file is auto-generated.
# User changes will be destroyed the next time authconfig is run.
auth required pam_env.so
auth sufficient pam_unix.so nullok try_first_pWhat does your pam system-auth look like for the account statements?
> -----Original Message-----
> From redhat-list-bounces@(protected)
> [mailto redhat-list-bounces@(protected)] On Behalf Of Troy# Group to enforce membership of
pam_groupdn cn troy_test ou Groups dc company dc com ## Yes I replaced
this with my basedn)
# Group member attribute
pam_member_attribute uniquemember
I am the onFor me I only had to make sure that the correct pam_member_attribute was
set inside the ldap.conf file.
Vince
> -----Original Message-----
> From redhat-list-bounces@(protected)
> [mailto redhat-liSo I have done this and restarted nscd and even rebooted but still everyone with an account can access the server. What I am I missing?
-Troy
-----Original Message-----
From redhat-list-bounces@ |
|
|
