On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Corneil du Plessis <corneil@(protected):
> This might be a silly question:
>
> Is there a reason why 32bit Ubuntu kernel is not built with 64GB support by
> default?

Do you know anyone who uses 32 bit and has a m/b that even supports
that much RAM?

Or more than say, 4gb?

Personally, if I had that much RAM (my present MB has 2 gb, and only 2
slots, so I have to take out the existing memory, and say put 2 8 gig
sticks (if available) to do 16 gig for instance.

But I wouldn't even bother putting a 32-bit version on it.


>
> Regards
>
> Corneil
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@(protected)
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@(protected)
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users