solarflow99 wrote:
> I find everyones thoughts interesting, the reason I had was if bind runs in
> a chroot, why nothing else. I don't know that bind was any less secure than
> apache.

Earlier releases of bind had a poor reputation. Apache's is stellar
(though some of the applications run under Apache aren't so good).

It's only relatively recently that RH has been shipping chrooted bind
(probably after bind had been fixed up somewhat).

Debian does not ship bind chrooted.
Novell does not ship bind chrooted in SLES10.





--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@(protected)
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list