It should be in the SRPM.

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Pedro Espinoza wrote:

> Just an update.
>
> 1. I was wrong suse x86_64. They ship 32bit and 64bit rpms seperately;
> whereas rhel ships them together.
> 2. I copied  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, and /lib64/libm.so.6,
> libc.so.6 from opensuse 10.2, which is loaded on dual core xeon dell
> box, to the box where I have problems with 64 bit executables. I
> renaed ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 as ld-suse.
>
> $time ./ld-suse --library-path /tmp/SUSE /tmp/sorttest64 20
>
> 173.58s real  172.16s user   1.33s system
>
> $ time /tmp/sorttest64 20
> 532.36s real  530.57s user   1.53s system
>
> The problem boils down to rhel glibc 2.5 configuration/compilation wrt
> /lib64/ld-linux*, libc.so, libm.so. Where can I get the glibic config
> options that redhat has used.
>
> As an aside, we are working with redhat support, but in vain.
>
>
>
>
> GNU C Library stable release version 2.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv5-list mailing list
> rhelv5-list@(protected)
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
>

--
 /------------------------------------+-------------------------\
|Stephen J. Gowdy              | CERN   Office: 32-2-A22|
|http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | CH-1211 Geneva 23     |
|                         | Switzerland         |
|EMail: gowdy@(protected)   |
 \------------------------------------+-------------------------/

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list