On Friday 29 February 2008 04:53:33 solarflow99 wrote:
> I was surprised by some of those recommendations since redhat linux has
> always used the UPG scheme, so users are their own groups anyways.

I'd be curious which recommendations you found surprising.


> There was no mention of that or how some of the recommendations including
> how custom SSL in each place was supposed to be useful.

Again, I'm curious where custom SSL was being recommended.


> It just seemed to come across as: of course redhat linux cant be secure,
> here's how to try and deal with it.

I don't pick up on that tone. Which guide did you get that from?

Thanks,
-Steve

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list