On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 17:30 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:27:21PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > Yeah, in theory. But the reality is that we "only ever" (those famous
> > words) have modules in that location. I think I'll add that test though,
> > because when that stops being true sometime, it'd be nice not to break.
>
> But now directories are printed too, so I was wondering how weak-modules
> reacts on directories on stdin.

Yeah, that's ok. It'll only deal with actual modules.

> > I agree that some solution for firmware is good, though I'm not yet sure
> > what we should do. Is it failing to build for you, or are you just
> > saying that the /lib/firmware directory doesn't exist on a target?
>
> The RPM build fails because %files includes /lib/firmware which isn't
> present.

Ah yeah, but I generally assume that directory will be in the module
source. I get the point though, ok so maybe a flag is useful :)

Jon.


_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list