On Mar 27, 2008, at 6:53 PM, Collins, Kevin [Beeline] wrote:

> I think the problem is the the "IN" in the second record does not
> belong
> there. The 2nd field is a type, and both "IN" and "MX" are types, so
> you
> shouldn't have both. The second line is an MX record, not an IN
> record,
> so lose the IN and I think you'll be fine.
>
> Kevin

Nope - It defines the class - INternet. MX defines the RR (Resource
Record) type. It should be there.
He's probably hitting an issue with not having a FQDN for the record.

jef

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list