Sorry, I haven't replied to my thread, but I've been traveling :-).
I see this same problem using 5.2 beta on x86_64 dom0 with 32-bit and 64-bit domU guests.
For what it's worth, I have 100+ guests with Sparse images and once they are imaged, they seem to perform just fine to me and seem to save 40-80% of the disk space compared with nonsparse images. So, I see a clear value in using sparse files and having them work. Moreover, for those of use who don't use GUIs, sparse images are the default for the 'virt-install' tool from RHEL.
Now, one thing I have noticed is that the slow formatting only seems to occur duing the install process. If I attach a 2nd sparse disk to my VM after the install and run mkfs on it, it seems to me to perform comparably to physical hardware. I just now attached a 150 GB sparse file to a running VM and made a file system on it in less than 2 minutes. So, at least for me, the problem seems confied to the anaconda install.
-Dave.
--
Dave Costakos
mailto:
david.costakos@gmail.com