Author Login
Post Reply
Dnia 2008-05-29, o godz. 12:04:50
Adam Williamson <awilliamson@(protected)):
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 20:53 +0200, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote:
> > Dnia 2008-05-29, o godz. 10:55:41
> > Adam Williamson <awilliamson@(protected)):
> >
> > > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:20 +0200, Tomasz Pawel Gajc wrote:
> > >
> > > > - re-enable Xft support
> > >
> > > I've really only been following this via the changelog (because I
> > > hate Firefox 3 more every time I try and use it...), but Xft is
> > > rarely the *best* choice of font rendering these days...what are
> > > the alternatives? What's the exact current situation? Have you
> > > tested it with tricky stuff like CJK and Arabic?
> >
> > Well i've tested rendering fonts on wikipedia, i takes some time to
> > render page in japanese but it works, same as bi-directional
> > languages.
>
> OK. How about this issue:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=803241
>
> specifically? Pay close attention to the example screenshots to see
> the 'wrong' and the 'right' rendering: it's a compound character
> created by overlaying two glyphs, the 'wrong' case has the glyphs
> incorrectly positioned relative to each other.
I'll do some tests with diabled pango.
--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor
www.mandriva.com
_
( )
X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/ \ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

Attachment:
signature.asc (zipped)