Author Login
Post Reply
Vincent Danen a écrit :
> * [2008-06-03 23:27:04 +0100] Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
>>>> Author: fwang
>>>> Date: Tue Jun 3 15:30:49 2008
>>>> New Revision: 214610
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> cooker/util-linux-ng/current/SPECS/util-linux-ng.spec
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> fix conflicts with new shadow-utils
>>>
>>> Oh, you did it already. Thanks. Looks like I did forget the
>>> manpages... wonder why I never saw the conflicts during upgrades?
>>
>> Perhaps you've got a macro defined that does not install manpages and
>> other documentation?
>
> If I do, I'm not aware of it. =) Pretty sure I have manpages and such
> installed.
>
>> I accidentally defined this with one install I did a while back - I
>> figured "why would I need docs?" and said as much during the
>> installation wizard.
>>
>> I didn't realise that it actually affected what files from within RPMs
>> got installed - I thought it just didn't install certain packages... I
>> was wrong :p
>
> No, I think I had the manpages and such installed. Wierd that the file
> clash never showed up for me.
Which arch ? We did had an evil patch in rpm that silenced conflict for
documentation files, but did not work equally between 32 and 64 bits.
--
Guillaume Rousse
Moyens Informatiques - INRIA Futurs
Tel: 01 69 35 69 62