Pixel wrote:
> colin <svn-commit@(protected):
>
>> Author: colin
>> Date: Wed Jun 18 10:25:39 2008
>> New Revision: 224987
>>
>> Added:
>>   cooker/x11-driver-video-intel/current/SOURCES/xf86-video-intel-2.3.2.tar.bz2
>>     - copied, changed from r224971, /cooker/x11-driver-video-intel/current/SOURCES/xf86-video-intel-2.3.1.tar.bz2
>> Removed:
>>   cooker/x11-driver-video-intel/current/SOURCES/xf86-video-intel-2.3.1.tar.bz2
>> Modified:
>>   cooker/x11-driver-video-intel/current/SPECS/x11-driver-video-intel.spec
>>
>> Log:
>> - New version
>> - Define _disable_ld_no_undefined to make it build
>
> adding "-lX11 -lXext -lXvMC -lXv -lpthread" fixes the build of
> libIntelXvMC.so.1.0.0
>
> since it looks like a real library, i don't see a reason for not
> linking it properly?
>
> nb: fedora created xorg-x11-drv-i810-devel containing libIntelXvMC.so,
> and got rid of .la

After reading libXvMCW source, it seems it can dlopen the versioned one
as well and it is thus safe to drop libIntelXvMC.so symlink from the
main package :)

I don't think this used to be the case.

--
Anssi Hannula