Den Monday 07 July 2008 19:25:34 skrev Adam Williamson:
> On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:40 +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Oden Eriksson <oeriksson@(protected):
> > + Revision: 232153
> > - use _disable_ld_no_undefined due to build problems
>
> (For this and libkmfl): I thought the whole point of the underlinking
> stuff was that we were supposed to identify and fix the problems, rather
> than just work around them by disabling underlinking? For shared
> libraries, at least. Or are they not fixable in this case?
>
> It just seems like installing a test for a problem and then disabling
> the test whenever it detects the problem is kind of a wasted effort. :)

I think many changelog entries in a row like " - use _disable_ld_no_undefined
due to build problems" misleads you into thinking I did it out of laziness or
because I don't care, or whenever I detect a problem. Please...

--
Regards // Oden Eriksson