On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:33 -0400, Charles A Edwards wrote:

> > Can you please post xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log for me to look at
> > somewhere? Is this a regression (i.e. did it work with any previous
> > version of radeonhd)? Thanks.
>
>
> www.eslrahc.com/Xorg.log
> www.eslrahc.com/xorg.conf.fglrx
> www.eslrahc.com/xorg.conf.radeonhdd
>
> Yes it is a regression.
>
> I had been sporadically testing the drivers at different release levels
> to compare performance between radeonhdd, ati, and vesa in the event
> that the fglrx driver should fail.

In Xorg.0.log , I note:

(EE) RADEONHD(0): The fglrx kernel module is loaded. This can have obvious
  or subtle side effects. See radeonhd(4) for details.

can you please unload fglrx and try again? If it still fails, do you
remember what was the last version of radeonhd with which it worked?
thanks.
--
adamw