On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 21:03 -0400, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:40:53 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > I had been sporadically testing the drivers at different release
> > > levels to compare performance between radeonhdd, ati, and vesa in
> > > the event that the fglrx driver should fail.
> >
> > In Xorg.0.log , I note:
> >
> > (EE) RADEONHD(0): The fglrx kernel module is loaded. This can have
> > obvious or subtle side effects. See radeonhd(4) for details.
> >
> > can you please unload fglrx and try again? If it still fails, do you
> > remember what was the last version of radeonhd with which it worked?
> > thanks.
>
>
> I get the same errors even after removing the fglrx module.
>
> Do not remember the version for the last radeonhdd that worked for me
> but I can tell you when.
>
> Feb 19.
>
> That was the the day you uploaded xf86-video-ati 6.8.0 and I tested
> both it and the then current radeonhdd driver with the ati driver
> getting my vote for the "new" default.

Thanks. I have forwarded your issue to the radeonhd developers.
--
adamw