Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II

Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II

2006-08-25       - By Paul Krizak

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

While I'm obviously a bit biased, I would definitely suggest going with
an Opteron-based solution.  AMD64 is the original x86-64 implementation
(EM64T is a clone of our architecture), and thus the linux community has
had more time to tweak the drivers, compilers, etc. to work with AMD64 cpus.

Also, going with AMD chips provides a long and stable upgrade path.  You
can start with dual-core DDR2/667 chips in your blades, and then when
quad-core comes out, you'll be able to upgrade to quad-core DDR2/800+
chips and stay within the same power envelope.

AMD chips scale much better past four cores than Intel's chips, due to
Intel sticking with the antiquated front side bus architecture, whereas
AMD has high-speed HyperTransport links between each chip.  When you get
those big beefy 4-socket 16-core blades, rest assured that the AMD
variety will perform much better than an equivalent Xeon configuration,
even if the 2-socket/4-core performance right now favors the Intel chips.

Paul Krizak                         5900 E. Ben White Blvd. MS 625
Advanced Micro Devices              Austin, TX  78741
Linux/Unix Systems Engineering      Phone: (512) 602-8775
Silicon Design Division


Collins, Kevin [MindWorks] wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>         we are in the process of buying some blades for our HP blade
> center to use for Linux servers. Since we are starting fresh, and I have
> no practical experience with Linux on 64-bit, I figured I would ask for
> input from the Taroon and Nahant list.
>
> Are there any technical reasons to prefer AMD64 (Opteron), EM64T (Xeon)
> or Itanium II CPUs? Are there things that don't work in RedHat on any of
> those platforms with either RHEL3 or RHEL4?
>
> Beyond that, we are currently running 32-bit on 32bit Xeon processors -
> I'm think I can also run 32-bit RedHat on either the AMD64 or EM64T
> chips - is that correct?
>
> I appreciate any comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>
> -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
>
> --
> nahant-list mailing list
> nahant-list@(protected)
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list


--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list