Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II

Opinions AMD64 vs EM64T vs Itanium II

2006-08-26       - By Kostas Georgiou

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:43:49PM -0400, Brian Long wrote:

> Some of our engineering folks use software that costs hundreds of
> thousands of dollars per head per year to lease and they always want the
> latest and greatest 2 socket system.  Considering the numbers on
> http://www.spec.org from Xeon 5160 vs. Opteron 254, we have to evaluate
> the Xeons.  :)

We are in the same situation here, it's hard to ingore the spec numbers
even if when you don't trust them. I don't have any woodcrest machines
yet but early reports from other people tell us that for *our* workloads
the woodcrest performance isn't as good as the spec numbers lead you to
believe and you see some performance loss (because of the FSB I guess)
when you run multiple jobs. It *is* faster than the Opteron though for our
workload.  

Kostas Georgiou

--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list