 | | | Question about /etc/group | Question about /etc/group 2007-07-27 - By Serge Dubrouski
Back
I think it's just a legacy. Old UNIXes required that you put users
into all groups that they belong to, no matter primary or secondary.
On 7/27/07, David Tonhofer <redhatter@(protected)> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a simle detail question:
>
> Sometimes users are registered as being secondary members of the group
> that is their primary group - why is that so?
>
> For example:
>
> User "uucp" has as primary group the group with gid 14:
>
> uucp:x:10:14:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:/sbin/nologin
>
> And group 14 is group "uucp". However, the user is also listed as being
> a secondary member of that group:
>
> uucp:x:14:uucp
>
> Which is pretty pointless. Or not?
>
> Best regards,
>
> -- David
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
Serge Dubrouski.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
|