RHEL 4 or 5 AS 64Bit OS 2007-08-16 - By Esquivel, Vicente
Back
Thanks for the reply Justin.
Why would you suggest 4 over 5, because it is new or are there other
reasons?
Vince
> -- --Original Message-- --
> From: redhat-list-bounces@(protected)
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@(protected)] On Behalf Of Justin Zygmont
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:34 PM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: RHEL 4 or 5 AS 64Bit OS
>
> Esquivel, Vicente wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > Is anyone running 64bit RHEL 4 or 5 AS on an intel based Dell Power
> > Edge 2950 with 2x(dual core) Xeon Woodcrest processors with 16GB of
> > RAM, since this is not true 64bit hardware but rather it is
> 32bit with
> > 64bit extensions. Dell claims that it supports 64bit RHEL
> on this hardware.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if there are having problems doing this or if
> > there would be anything I should take into consideration
> when trying
> > to decide to run 32bit RHEL or 64bit RHEL. The application I will
> > running on this server supports both 32 or 64 bit.
>
>
> I have one of those, I know rhel 64 bit will work well with
> it, but I can't remember if it already had the drivers for
> the PERC5i or not, you may need to use a driver disk.
> Unfortunately windoze had to go onto it instead, and Dell
> doesn't know much about their own stuff.
>
> I think rhel 5, 64 bit would be the best for you, hope it helps..
>
>
>
>
> Justin Zygmont
> System and Network Administrator
> Cityfone Telecommunications Inc
>
> 604.629.8841
> justin at cityfone dot net
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
