-none- 2007-10-04 - By m.roth2006@(protected)
Back
>Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:20:22 -0500
>From: "Litton, Tom - CEPM" <Tom.Litton@(protected)>
>
>I would recommend subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) instead of
>cvs. I like it a lot better.
I knew subversion would come up. We use it at work. I do *NOT* like it. Reason
1: it looks like you have to check out a whole directory, and that you can't
check out just one file. Speaking as someone who did, among other things,
configuration management for about 11 years, I *HATE* this idea, since if you
've got multiple developers, and one is working on one file in a directory, and
another on another file in the same directory....
I won't start on the aggro here, where they normally *don't* lock the checked
out files... which is exactly what version control is supposed to prevent.
mark "why, yes, most of that time was with PVCS"
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
