partitioning scheme 2007-11-04 - By Mad Unix
Back
What you think about this?
/boot ---> local disk
/ ----> localdisk
swap -- ---> localdisk
/tmp -- --> SAN
/usr -- ---> SAN
/home -- --> SAN
/opt -- --> SAN
/var -- ----> SAN
/u01 -- --> SAN
On 11/4/07, mark <m.roth2006@(protected)> wrote:
>
> Mad Unix wrote:
> > which partitioning scheme would you recommend (/boot, /, /tmp, swap,
> /u01,
> > /home, /opt, /var) for a server 2x73G with 16GRAM attached to SAN
> storage.
> > am planning to keep most of file systems and live data on the SAN in
> case
> > any fault on the server I can replace it with onther hardware identical
> one.
>
> I'd offer the article I wrote that came out in the July 07 issue of
> SysAdmin,
> but the mag gave up the ghost, and its website shows a servlet error....
>
> Anyway, I would *STRONGLY* recommend /boot, / and swap be local (though
> preferably have swap on its own partition, if not a different drive than
> /).
> /u01 - using Oracle, are we? These days, it tends to wind up under
> /opt/oracle.
> Anyway, I'd put the rest there.
>
> MMmm, come to think of it, I think I'd want /var local, since that
> includes
> things like the rpm database of packages installed on that machine.
>
> mark
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
madunix
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
