Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
file system preference?

file system preference?

2003-12-20       - By Jonathan Horne

 Back
Reply:     1     2  

Recently I learned that I don 't have to live with the file system that red
hat recommends (ext3), and that FC1 and even 9 down to I believe 7.3 had the
option to begin with 'linux reiserfs ' or 'linux jfs ', (maybe there were even
some other options?).



Ive loaded up an FC1 box and a 9 box both with a try at reiserfs, and so far
performance is defiantly good, but I don 't think im tuned enough to know the
difference.



Does anyone have any file system opinions they might like to share? Im at
the beginning of what looks like a really good article on the IBM site
( http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs.html ), but I think
I would really benefit from hearing what my redhat peers have to say on this
topic.



Thanks,

Jonathan


<html xmlns:o= "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office " xmlns:w= "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word " xmlns= " http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40 " >

<head >
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content= "text/html; charset=us-ascii " >
<meta name=Generator content= "Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium) " >
<style >
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
   {margin:0in;
   margin-bottom:.0001pt;
   font-size:12.0pt;
   font-family: "Times New Roman ";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
   {color:blue;
   text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
   {color:purple;
   text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
   {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
   font-family:Arial;
   color:windowtext;}
@(protected) Section1
   {size:8.5in 11.0in;
   margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
   {page:Section1;}
-- >
</style >

</head >

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple >

<div class=Section1 >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' >Recently I learned that I don’t have to live with the file
system that red hat recommends (ext3), and that FC1 and even 9 down to I believe
7.3 had the option to begin with ‘linux reiserfs’ or ‘linux
jfs’, (maybe there were even some other options?). <o:p > </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' > <o:p >  </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' >Ive loaded up an FC1 box and a 9 box both with a try at
reiserfs, and so far performance is defiantly good, but I don’t think im
tuned enough to know the difference. <o:p > </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' > <o:p >  </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' >Does anyone have any file system opinions they might like to
share?  Im at the beginning of what looks like a really good article on
the IBM site ( <a
href= " http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs.html " > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs.html </a >),
but I think I would really benefit from hearing what my redhat peers have to
say on this topic. <o:p > </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' > <o:p >  </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' >Thanks, <o:p > </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

<p class=MsoNormal > <font size=2 face=Arial > <span style= 'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial ' >Jonathan <o:p > </o:p > </span > </font > </p >

</div >

</body >

</html >