Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Stupid Question

Stupid Question

2002-07-02       - By Frank Tanner III

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3  

Maybe someone can answer the logic behind why it is
that Red Hat keeps patching against an old version of
OpenSSH, rather than completely updating it.

There have been three revisions to OpenSSH since the
version that Red Hat released with v7.3, yet they
continue to patch against version 3.1 rather than test
and release 3.4.

Even in Rawhide there is only version 3.1.

Patching against an "out dated " application rather
than releasing the newer version seems kind of
backwards to me. Maybe someone can explain the logic
behind this. I know alot of Red Hat employees lurk on
this list and unofficially answer questions from time
to time. I am hoping that one of them can give me an
answer.

Thank you.


__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com