 | | | openoffice-1.0.1-3.1rh73 (was Re: Unable to use OO as user) | openoffice-1.0.1-3.1rh73 (was Re: Unable to use OO as user) 2002-08-22 - By Bill Rugolsky Jr.
Back
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 05:26:46PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:15:45AM -0400, Javier Gostling wrote:
> > Seems like to install the RedHat RPMs of OOo you have to upgrade to GCC 3
> > and some other stuff which will come in limbo. I might start trying that
> > stuff once I get the home computer going, but the work computer is too
> > critical a system to take my chances. Still staying with AbiWorg and
> > Gnumeric.
>
> Well, with libstdc++.so.5, libdb* and libgcc_s.so.1 this is trivial to
> solve, you just unpack the libraries into /usr/lib/openoffice/program/
> after --nodeps install.
> redhat-menus dependency can be ignored if you put OOo into menus yourself,
> the only problematic one is libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3). This is to get
> realpath@(protected) symbol. This would be solved most easily by glibc upgrade
> or hacking up oo startup scripts to run the programs through
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/ld-linux.so.2 program_name
> (and you 'd have to copy all the glibc libraries in
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program).
After some pain I have managed to patch and build openoffice-1.0.1-3
on RH 7.3 using gcc-2.96-112. It *seems* to work, more-or-less.
You don 't want to build it -- the last build (of perhaps 10 attempts!) took
8.5 hours.
Unfortunately, I don 't have a convenient high-bandwidth location to stuff
the RPMS. Any takers?
I 've also got a gcc3-3.2-1 for 7.3
Should I start a SourceForge project?
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky
|
|
|