Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
RH Linux Enterprise version?

RH Linux Enterprise version?

2003-11-05       - By William Hooper

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9  

hongwei@(protected) said:
> Hi,
>
> Redhat announced that they will not support rh 7, 8, 9 soon, and
> encourage people to migrate to enterprise version.

The EOL dates were announced months ago.  The only change with this
announcement is that there is no "Red Hat Linux", it is "Fedora" and Red
Hat won't provide any SLA support for Fedora.

>  My question is: what
> version should I use, WS or ES if I want to setup it as an email and web
> server (as well as file and printer sharing) for a couple of hundreds
> users? Since WS is much cheaper than ES, I'd like to order WS if it works
> for the above purpose.

RH has a nice chart:

http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/comparison/

As you can see, WS includes Apache httpd.  Mail would be another question,
and I guess it would depend on what services you wanted to provide (smtp,
pop3, imap) and if you were planning to use the RH apps anyway.  The OS
will do it, you just might not get support for it if you call RH.

--
William Hooper