Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
• application/x mplayer2 plugin
• RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
• Command stream end of file while reading
• X Windows problem (xauth)
• Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
• FTP: connection refused
• FTP: connection refused
• mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
• Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
• how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
• Virus on the list
• UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
• usb pen drives: mounting as a user
• broadcom network interface
• make mrproper
• sendmail configuration on redhat
• Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
• Promise 378 controller
• kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
• Problem using up2date
• mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
• Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
• Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
• HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
• Lotus Notes under Wine
• /etc/security/limits conf question
• Intel E/1000 driver
• Command stream end of file while reading
• rpm database corrupt
• qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Speed differences between RH8 and Winblows?

Speed differences between RH8 and Winblows?

2004-01-13       - By Cannon, Andrew

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6  

Hi all,

I 'm just collating some results from a test run I did using a Monte Carlo
code on two different computers, one was a 1.5GHz P4 running Windows 2000
and the other was a 2.0GHz P4 running RH8.

The Windows machine was faster than the RH machine. I ran the test again and
got the same result. The difference was only 10%, but it was a surprise. Has
anyone got any idea why there was so much of a difference?

The test case didn 't use much memory and the version of the program was the
same in both cases (apart from running on different OSs of course).

Andrew

Andrew Cannon, Nuclear Technology (J2), NNC Ltd, Booths Hall, Knutsford,
Cheshire, WA16 8QZ.

Telephone; +44 (0) 1565 843768
email: mailto:andrew.cannon@(protected)
NNC website: http://www.nnc.co.uk



NNC 's UK Operating Companies : NNC Holdings Limited (no. 3725076), NNC Limited (no. 1120437), National Nuclear Corporation Limited (no. 2290928), STATS-NNC Limited (no. 4339062) and Technica-NNC Limited (no. 235856). The registered office of each company is at Booths Hall, Chelford Road, Knutsford, Cheshire WA16 8QZ except for Technica-NNC Limited whose registered office is at 6 Union Row, Aberdeen AB10 1DQ. NNC 's head office and principal address is Booths Hall and the switchboard number is 01565 633800. The NNC website is www.nnc.co.uk

Any information or opinions in this message which do not relate to our business are not authorised by any of the above companies. Where this message does relate to our business the content is sent to you by the relevant company (as above) and is confidential and intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The contents do not form part of any contract unless so stated. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the NNC system manager by email at eadm@(protected)


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list