Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Denying e-mail based on a word in the body of message -- > in sendmail 8.11.6

Denying e-mail based on a word in the body of message -- > in sendmail 8.11.6

2003-04-10       - By jdow

 Back
From: "gti617" <gti617@(protected)>

> If an e-mail is addressed to one of your group members and it contains the
> word "viagra" within the
> body or subject of the message. How can you block receiving this type
> messages

Easily with the likes of SpamAssassin.

? and send a message back
> to the sender; informing them, "to cut the sh.." as a warning.

MEVER do this for several reasons.

First it tells them your address is a "live one", if it actually goes
back to them instead of some innocent.

Second Reply to: addresses are almost always forged. So how do you
reply to them? At worst you spam an innocent.

Third the headers are often forged as well. So there is often no way
to get a message back to the actual sender, who would probably toss
the reply on the floor. At worst you spam an innocent.

You are far better off to simply drop the messages on the floor.
Of course, if you had such a dumb filter as to simply chop messages
based on the presence of a single word then note how this hopefully
slightly helpful message about eliminating messages containing the
word "Viagra" would never reach you.

SpamAssassin is a smarter filter and does a remarkably good job on
spam. With a small library of custom filters and scores I am quite
successfully and accurately tagging 30 to 50 spams a day and missing
only two or three per day using an already obsolete version. Incorrect
tags happen perhaps once a week at most. At this level of success
any puny attempts I might make to reinvent this wheel would be rather
pointless.

{^_^}





Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.