Urgent,Upgrade Glibc 2.3 Failed,can 't boot 2003-02-28 - By John Dalbec
Back >>From: seawolf-list-admin@(protected) >>[mailto:seawolf-list-admin@(protected)]On Behalf Of Hong Li >>Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:34 PM >>To: seawolf-list@(protected) >>Subject: Urgent,Upgrade Glibc 2.3 Failed,can't boot >> >> >>Guys, >> >>Please help me on this! My linux box is redhat 7.x, not sure (but in /boot >>it's vmlinuz-2 (See http://nuz-2.ora-code.com).4.7-10 and kernel.h-2.4.7). While I try to install >>libxml2.4 >>rpm, it ask for glibc 6 so I guess mine is libc 5. then i start a pain >>process. so many depencies. Finally, I start with install new gcc >>3.2.2(install successfully) and glibc 2.3.1, and linuxthread >> >>Follow steps in INSTALL file from glibc2.3.1, but when make install, I >>can't remember if I type "env LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C" with "make install", >>anyway, after that, I type any command, said " >> >>/bin/sh: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: version 'GLBIC_2.3' not found (required by >>/lib/libdl.s0.2) >>/bin/sh: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: version 'GLBIC_PRIVATE' not found >>(required by >>/lib/libdl.s0.2) >>/bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.1.1' not found (required by >>/lib/i686/libc.s0.6) >>/bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.2.3' not found (required by >>/lib/i686/libc.s0.6) >>/bin/sh: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLBIC_2.2' not found (required by >>/lib/i686/libc.s0.6)
It looks like ld.so is finding an old version of libc.so.6. (I presume that's GLIBC not GLBIC.) You might try mv /mnt/sysimage/lib/i686 /mnt/sysimage/lib/i686.old or if that doesn't help rm -r /mnt/sysimage/lib/i686 Where did you install the new glibc? Is it in /lib/libc.so.6? John Dalbec
>> >> >> >>and when I reboot, said "kernel panic...", now I boot with RH 8.0 CD with >>"linux rescue", so every file is there under /mnt/sysimage. What should I >>do???? searched alot but no solution, seems from reading this >>might be some >>symbol link error? though installed those glibc2.3 but hadn't really link >>correctly by ld? What should I do ????Many many thanks, >> >> >>Vincent
|
|