Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Obtaining RHELv3 binaries without RH

Obtaining RHELv3 binaries without RH

2003-11-12       - By Dax Kelson

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3  

Hypothetically speaking, suppose Joe Blow walked up to you and handed
you copies of RHELv3 AS CDROMs.

If Joe Blow had and agreement with RH, he would be in violation, but
what would your obligation be if any to:

* Installing and using the software
* Creating and redistribution binary isos from the CDROMs?

According to http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html it says,

"IF CUSTOMER DOES NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THEN IT MUST
NOT USE OR PURCHASE RED HAT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. "

I can understand the "MOST NOT PURCHASE ", but how can the "MUST NOT USE "
apply?

If you don 't accept the terms of the agreement, how can you be bound by
a term (MUST NOT USE) of the agreement?

Finally, was this "MUST NOT USE " provision always in there? I could
swear I read the agreement a couple months ago and it wasn 't there.

Just curious,

Dax Kelson