Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
install apache 2.0 - source or rpm?

install apache 2.0 - source or rpm?

2004-02-11       - By Andy Firman

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7  

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:42:56AM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:49:04AM -0500, Andy Firman wrote:
> > I am trying to build an apache 2.0.48 rpm for
> > RedHat 9 like this:
>
> The first question you need to ask yourself is why you 're trying to
> build this version. In many cases that I 've seen, new users are
> misguided in thinking that they need or want the latest version rather
> than concentrating on getting the current version working.

Well I am not a new Linux user, but a new "RedHat 9 " user.

I had a client ask me to do 2 things to his Redhat 9 box.
Get Apache 2.0.48 and PHP 4.3.4 installed.

I failed miserably on both and am now taking a big step back to do
this stuff on one of my test boxes. Time to learn!

>
> > A more basic question is, what is the preferred way
> > to get the latest software into RedHat 9?
>
> The preferred way is to stay at the version that Red Hat provides.
> That 's one of the values that the distributor provides - to solve
> dependency issues.
>

I agree 100%. But the client asked me for the latest and greatest.


> > Or should I really try hard to stay with the package
> > management system?
>
> rpm is very powerful is you use it as it 's intended. If you fight it,
> it will hurt you in the end.

I agree 100%. Same thing with Debian 's dpkg system.

>
> So let 's back up and start with defining the problem that you 're
> actually trying to solve, not what you 're trying to do.
>
> .../Ed
>
> p.s. Don 't take this is a personal attack - I once too thought that I
> always needed the latest release.
>

No offense taken. I greatly appreciate your comments and feedback.

How about I ask the question this way:

"If you were asked to install Apache 2.0.48 and PHP 4.3.4 on a
RedHat 9 server, how would you do the task at hand? "

:-)

I look forward to hearing how everyone would approach this.


Thanks,
Andy


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list