 | | | OT: short but sweet story | OT: short but sweet story 2004-02-18 - By Mailing Lists
Back
It is a general rule around here that if you have probs with a Windows
PC, reboot it first before calling for help. :-)
Ben Yau wrote:
> Hey all
>
> something entertaining for you guys... off topic. Hope no one minds.
>
> While I still remain quite technologically agnostic (most of the time), I
> still maintain that for most cases windows is better kept on the desktop and
> out of the data center.
>
> So there 's a programmer here I joke around with. He has a laptop and
> desktop both running XP Pro and he 's programming a java mail client to talk
> to our redhat linux mail server port 25. It stopped working this afternoon
> (around 3pm) and around 4:30pm he asks me what we did to the mail server.
> Short debugging shows that laptop and desktop both can ping the mail server.
> Desktop gets a connection telnetting to port 25 on mail server. Laptop
> doesn 't get the connection.
>
> I 'm confident the mail server is fine, we had no reason to touch it this
> afternoon.
>
> "Oh come on you guys changed something-... "
>
> (At this time I was reading the SAMBA how-to collection with the nice quote
> about Microsoft from Linus Torvalds so you can tell what kind of mindset I 'm
> in ) (P.S. I will append the quote at the bottom. It 's quite LONG but good
> reading)
>
>
> "Hey, isn 't your laptop Windows? "
>
> "Yeah. "
>
> "Reboot it. "
>
> "What? Come on. "
>
> "No seriously. "
>
> "Give me a legit reason. "
>
> "You 're running on windows.. that 's legit. "
>
> And I get to feeling a little daring.
>
> "Come on, I 'll give you even odds it 'll be fixed when you reboot "
>
> Moral of the story.. if you do want to make money, try to sucker them in
> with better odds. Like 3 to 1 or something. :) Maybe that way they 'll take
> the bet. Yes, for some reason it worked after rebooting.
>
>
> Cheers-
> Ben Yau
> Here 's the quote (it is in the SAMBA How-To Collection.pdf in chapter 1)
>
> **
>
> What 's fundamentally wrong is that nobody ever had any taste when they has
> been very much into making the user interface look good, but internally
> complete mess. And even people who program for Microsoft and who have had
> experience, just don 't know how it works internally. Worse, nobody dares
> change dares to fix bugs because it 's such a mess that fixing one bug might
> just programs that depend on that bug. And Microsoft isn 't interested in
> anyone they 're interested in making money. They don 't have anybody who takes
> pride 95 as an operating system.
>
> People inside Microsoft know it 's a bad operating system and they still
> continue working on it because they want to get the next version out because
> they these new features to sell more copies of the system.
>
> The problem with that is that over time, when you have this kind of
> approach, nobody understands it, because nobody REALLY fixes bugs (other
> than when obvious), the end result is really messy. You can 't trust it
> because under circumstances it just spontaneously reboots or just halts in
> the middle of something strange. Normally it works fine and then once in a
> blue moon for some completely reason, it 's dead, and nobody knows why. Not
> Microsoft, not the experienced certainly not the completely clueless user
> who probably sits there shivering thinking I do wrong? " when they didn 't do
> anything wrong at all.
>
> That 's what 's really irritating to me. "
> - Linus Torvalds, from an interview with BOOT Magazine, Sept 1998
>
> **
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- ---- ---
The Constitution of the United States shall never be construed to
prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from
keeping their own arms.
-- Samuel Adams, During the Massachusetts U.S. Constitution ratification
convention, 1788
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
|