Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
• application/x mplayer2 plugin
• RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
• Command stream end of file while reading
• X Windows problem (xauth)
• Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
• FTP: connection refused
• FTP: connection refused
• mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
• Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
• how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
• Virus on the list
• UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
• usb pen drives: mounting as a user
• broadcom network interface
• make mrproper
• sendmail configuration on redhat
• Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
• Promise 378 controller
• kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
• Problem using up2date
• mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
• Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
• Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
• HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
• Lotus Notes under Wine
• /etc/security/limits conf question
• Intel E/1000 driver
• Command stream end of file while reading
• rpm database corrupt
• qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Support for > 2TB FS?

Support for > 2TB FS?

2004-02-20       - By Milan Kerslager

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6  

Hi,

I just readed latest "Under the brim ".

At http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/kernel26/ i see that there is no
stabilization under "Support for > 2TB FS ".

There is a sentence:

"In general, the few features that have not been backported are still
insufficiently mature for commercial environments, or are not considered
necessary by customers and ISV partners. "

What I may expect about large FS? We are doing a lot of manipulation
with many large files and we really need > 1TB FS....

As this feature is only one considered "not soon supported " there I 'm a
litte bit disappointed.

--
Milan Kerslager
E-mail: milan.kerslager@(protected)
WWW: http://www.pslib.cz/~kerslage/


--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list