Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
• application/x mplayer2 plugin
• RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
• Command stream end of file while reading
• X Windows problem (xauth)
• Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
• FTP: connection refused
• FTP: connection refused
• mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
• Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
• how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
• Virus on the list
• UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
• usb pen drives: mounting as a user
• broadcom network interface
• make mrproper
• sendmail configuration on redhat
• Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
• Promise 378 controller
• kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
• Problem using up2date
• mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
• Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
• Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
• HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
• Lotus Notes under Wine
• /etc/security/limits conf question
• Intel E/1000 driver
• Command stream end of file while reading
• rpm database corrupt
• qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Support for > 2TB FS?

Support for > 2TB FS?

2004-02-20       - By Jesse Keating

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6  

On Friday 20 February 2004 00:14, Milan Kerslager wrote:
> What I may expect about large FS? We are doing a lot of manipulation
> with many large files and we really need > 1TB FS....
>
> As this feature is only one considered "not soon supported " there I 'm
> a litte bit disappointed.

Keep waiting. RHEL3 doesn 't even support >1TB. The kernel itself does,
just don 't use parted to make your partition. A co-worker of mine
found a bug in the ioctl that parted uses that blocks partitions to
1TB. Seems to still exist in kernel 2.6.

--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating