Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
professional workstation

professional workstation

2004-02-21       - By William Hooper

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6  


Craig Toenes said:
> I currently have RH 9 and I am not hip enough for
> Fedora.
> I saw that RH recently came out with a "Professional
> Workstation" that has updates and is renewable.  My
> question is.. Do you think this is a good option for
> those of us who are not savy enough for developement?

I wouldn't consider Fedora "development".

With that said, RHPW _is_ RHEL WS, with different support options.

> If I can do an upgrade as opposed to a fresh install,

In the same sense that you can try using "upgradeany" to upgrade, but it
is not officially supported.

> this would be perfect for someone like me that wants
> to
> use RH on a personal scale. What do you guys think?

That the Taroon-List is a better place for RHEL and RHPW questions.

--
William Hooper


--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list



Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.