Mailing List
Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Red Hat Linux 7.1 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.1 (Seawolf)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
How to get RPMs without up2date?

How to get RPMs without up2date?

2004-02-24       - By Bob Gorman

 Back
Reply:     <<     11     12     13     14     15     16     17     18     19     20     >>  

At 12:47 PM 2/24/2004, Hamilton Andrew wrote:
>I agree. It is insufficient to most but the barest needs, but I think that is the way it was designed. RH only wants the current version of the RPMs available via this utility. I do understand the reasoning I guess, they save bandwidth and it 's probably easier to say that they don 't support past versions of RPMs and if you have issues with it then you should upgrade, blah, blah, blah, you know what I mean. It would be a nightmare to have to support various applications and all their previous versions and I 'm not sure their structure supports even making them available. I would think that making them available might make support tougher because someone may accidently get old versions of stuff and on and on...

Indeed, up2date is designed to service the 'end user '. And it 's a great tool for those new to Linux.

However, I live on the other side of the fence, doing research, development and supporting production machines. I provide the resolution to 'end user ' issues, effectively shielding RedHat.

Sometimes the most current version/RPM for a piece of software is the problem, not the solution.

Trying to force qualified technicians to use a brain-damaged end-user interface is evil. RedHat needs to provide a support model for support personnel.

This could be done by providing a means of access separate from up2date. That 's my preferred solution, avoid the proprietary interface all together. Or perhaps, by yet more modifications to up2date. Yucky, but doable. For instance: a few new command line switched should do the trick.

Something like:
up2date --give-me-every-rpm-that-exists --channel rhel-i386-es-3 -d

And:
up2date --give-me-this-exact-rpm kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-4.0.2.EL.i686 -d

Additionally, one should be able to run this from a non-RedHat supported machine.




--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list