 | | | Bastille for RHEL3? | Bastille for RHEL3? 2004-02-26 - By Joshua Jensen
Back
It does something like one of a dozen or so things. Things like making
sure you proper file permissions, walking you through turning off
unneeded services in inetd/xinetd, optionally chroot 'ing bind, sanity
checking sendmail, etc, etc.
See
http://bastille-linux.org/bastille1.jpg
for a sample.
It wouldn 't be a bad thing for Red Hat to at least review what is being
done, and evaluate shipping with some of Bastille 's defaults "out of the
box ".
Joshua
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:44:01PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:11, Doug Stewart wrote:
> > -- --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-- --
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Does anyone have an inside scoop as to why the Bastille site hasn 't been
> > updated for RHEL3? The brief blurb at the top of their page (dated
> > 1/19/2004) claims that support for RHEL was supposed to be released to
> > coincide with LWCE in NYC, but I haven 't seen anything since.
> >
> > I 'd really love to get some of my servers hardened and verified ASAP.
>
> Fedora Core 1 has execshield fwiw; which seems to do what bastille does
> too (maybe bastille does more but I couldn 't find information about what
> it does exactly... mind giving us the highlights ??)
--
Joshua Jensen
joshua@(protected)
"If God didn 't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat? "
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
|