 | | | RedHat ES: installing on multiple servers with one license | RedHat ES: installing on multiple servers with one license 2004-03-01 - By werner maes
Back
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN " >
<html >
<head >
<meta http-equiv= "Content-Type " content= "text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 " >
<title > </title >
</head >
<body text= "#000000 " bgcolor= "#ffffff " >
<br >
<br >
Herman Sheremetyev wrote: <br >
<blockquote type= "cite " cite= "mid1078179839.29589.143.camel@(protected) " >
<blockquote type= "cite " >
<pre wrap= " " >At 15:54 1/03/2004, you wrote:
</pre >
<blockquote type= "cite " >
<pre wrap= " " >On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:42:20PM +0100, werner maes wrote:
</pre >
<blockquote type= "cite " >
<pre wrap= " " > That 's why I assume that it is free to use RHEL if you don 't want
</pre >
</blockquote >
<pre wrap= " " >support
</pre >
<blockquote type= "cite " >
<pre wrap= " " > and don 't use RedHat Network (which is impossible anyway)
</pre >
</blockquote >
<pre wrap= " " >One of those services is binary updates. You may not legally apply
those to multiple systems without buying multiple subscriptions.
</pre >
</blockquote >
</blockquote >
<pre wrap= " " > <!---- >
Why can 't you legally apply the binary updates to systems you don 't have
a subscription for? They 're GPL (for the most part) licensed aren 't
they? I didn 't see anything in my Redhat EULA that says this is
illegal.
</pre >
</blockquote >
Good question ! I thought that the binary rpms are GPL licensed too. Or
are the binary rpms proprietary? <br >
<br >
Werner <br >
</body >
</html >
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
|