Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Apache Benchmark - static HTML Results Question

Apache Benchmark - static HTML Results Question

2004-03-30       - By Roger

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6  


Around Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:43:45AM +0200,  Arjan van de Ven, wrote:
>
> > Isn't this _slow_??? I mean, look at the numbers and the difference
> > in specs between the server and my laptop!
> >
> > In the article, the writer uses a 2x3.2GHz Xeon and gets up to 4730
> > requests/sec!!
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if I'm benchmarking it wrongly or something else
> > is happening??
>
> -c 1000 spawns a lot of parallel work for both the client app and the
> server, so you basically kill your performance context switching...
>
> also the number of requests you do is equal to the number of threads so
> each thread only does 1 request, with the result that that 1 request
> gets the full setup hit of such a thread....
I tried my desktop with ab -n 1000 -c 200 http://localhost
returned: 47.3 requests/s
Rerunning with:
ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://localhost
returns: 1858.95 requests/s







--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.