 | | | Bind and RHEL3 [was Re: Where 'd tree go?] | Bind and RHEL3 [was Re: Where 'd tree go?] 2004-10-15 - By Lee Whatley, Contractor
Back
While I completely agree with you that 9.3.0 should go in RHEL4, I
really wish that Redhat would backport some of the new IPv6 code from
9.3.0 into their 9.2.4 package. IPv6 support in the 9.2.x series is not
100% functional and 9.3.0 adds vast improvements in this area
(dual-stack support, support for listening on specific IPv6 interfaces,
etc). I don 't think this is going to happen though...
nathan r. hruby wrote:
> Personally, I feel 9.3.0 is a fine candidate for RHEL4, because of some of
> the changes it makes. ISC is quite happy to keep supporting the 9.2
> series so I don 't see an issue.
--
Lee S. Whatley, Contractor
NAVOCEANO MSRC
Lockheed Martin Space Operations - Stennis Programs
1001 Balch Boulevard
Stennis Space Center, MS 39522
Phone: 228-688-4999
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
|