Samba--Connection Refused 2004-12-14 - By Wayne Watson
Back
Results below.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:33:50 -0800, Wayne Watson wrote:
>
>
>>>If you try without
>>>
>>> only_from=localhost 192.168.0.2
>>>
>>>or with
>>>
>>> only_from=127.0.0.1 192.168.0.2
>>>
>>>and restart xinetd, what do you get? Using reverse lookup with
>>>"localhost" must work before you could use it, so stick to numeric
>>>addresses for your local environment.
>>>
>>
>>I used the second form, and still have the same problem.
>
>
> Then try without only_from restrictions. Don't forget to restart xinetd.
Restarted xinetd, but it made no difference when I pulled the only_from line.
>
> If that still doesn't work, log in as root, stop xinetd (service
> xinetd stop), and run /usr/sbin/swat manually in a terminal.
> When running "netstat -tpan | grep 901", you should see that
> something listens on port 901. Make sure you have the "wget"
> package installed, then run "wget --server http://127.0.0.1:901"
> and post the output.
I stopped the service, ran swat, and while in another terminal ran netstat. the
netstat output did not have a 901 according to the grep. wget-1 (See http://get-1.ora-code.com).8.2-9 is on my
RH9
system. Here's the output from it:
[root@(protected) root]# wget --server http://127.0.0.1:901 > junk_wget
--09:04:40-- http://127.0.0.1:901/
=> `index.html'
Connecting to 127.0.0.1:901... failed: Connection refused.
>
>
>>Note that I posted a msg
>>that I had incompletely updated Samba to 3.0.9-... with only one of the four
>>necessary files. I removed it and installed the latest four files from the RH
9
>>update page, 3.2.7b.
>
>
> Which may be part of your problems. 2.2.7a-8.9.0 is the very latest for
> Red Hat Linux 9, which was not released by the Fedora Legacy project.
Note that I'm using RHL9 right out of the box, and have not migrated to Fedora.
>
>
>>Although I know Mozilla (1.2.1) works for me on the web, I'm going to try to
upgrade
>>it to the latest version (1.4.2-...) as found on the update page. However, 1
.2.1
>>does have the bothersome German difficulty.
>
>
> That's an entirely different and unexpected problem. What do you
> get for
>
> cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n
> rpm -qa 'mozilla*'
>
> ?
>
Here's the output for the above moz check:
LANG="en_US.UTF-8 (See http://UTF-8.ora-code.com)"
SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8 (See http://UTF-8.ora-code.com):en_US:en"
SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
rpm--qa 'mozilla' only listed mozilla, one package. I believe it was 1.2.1, as
it
should be. Forgot to write it on my floppy or take a note.
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
|
|
