Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
what is your opinion on White Box linux???

what is your opinion on White Box linux???

2005-03-14       - By Ed Wilts

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:20:19PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 21:02 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> > I heard White Box is "clone" of Redhat AS software.
> > My company plan to switch from Redhat AS to White Box
> > to save cost.  What is opinion on White Box?
> >
> > Does it stable enough? how about upgrade and third
> > party driver support (e.g. Qlogic card, EMC powerpath,
> > ..) ?
>
> technical issues aside, you need to be aware that most ISVs (EMC, Oracle
> and the like) do not support/certify White Box Linux. So if you require
> a certified environment (if you have a SAN you most likely do) then WB
> might not be the best choice for you.

Further to this point, it should be noted that inot only will the ISVs
not certify on the rebuild, I have seen software that explicitely checks
to see if you're running RHEL or a rebuild and will fail to install on a
rebuild.  It could be said that this is poor programming (e.g. parsing
the output of /etc/redhat-release or /etc/issue or looking for a .EL
kernel version) but it's something you need to be aware of.  The
rebuilds are NOT RHEL - they don't claim to be and they're not.  They're
not simply RHEL without support - they're technically different.  White
Box Linux is not a clone of RHEL - it's a slight fork of the product.

It's very likely that if you need EMC Powerpath that you'll need to
purchase a RHEL subscription.  Having dealt with EMC in the past,
there's absolutely no way they'll support White Box Linux - you can
certainly ask EMC for their opinion on this.  One may also wonder how
you can afford the money for EMC hardware but not a RHEL subscription...

If you really need RHEL, then you need a subscription.  In an EMC SAN
environment, I personally wouldn't rely on White Box Linux or any other
rebuild/fork.

       .../Ed

--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@(protected)
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.