 | | | two subnets thru same wire | two subnets thru same wire 2005-03-25 - By David Balazic
Back
If you set the netmask to 255.255.0.0 on all hosts, then this will work
without any problems.
A switch will give better performance under high loads, otherwise it is more
or less the same a normal hub.
Regards,
David
-- --Original Message-- --
From: redhat-list-bounces@(protected) [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@(protected)]
On Behalf Of Shiraz Baig
Sent: 25. marec 2005 5:34
To: redhat
Subject: two subnets thru same wire
My question realtes the fact, whether we can have two
subnets passing thru same wire and communicating with
each other. The two subnets are:
-- ---- ---- ----
| Hub |
-- ---- ---- ----
| | | |
-- ---- ---- ---- | | -- ---- ---- --
| -- ---- -- ---- |
| | | |
192.168.10.3 | | 192.168.11.5
A 192.168.11.3 192.168.10.5 D
B C
It is a six port Hub. Four hosts with IP addresses
given above are attached to the hub. There are two
subnets 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.11.0.
The netmask is 255.255.255.0 in all cases.
Q1: Will Host A be able to talk to Host C?
Q2: Will Host B be able to talk to Host D?
Q3: If the communication is possible, are there likely
to be any problems?
Q4. If instead of switch, we use hub, will it make any difference?
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
|
|
|