 | | | Clustering options | Clustering options 2005-03-31 - By Rafael Ferreira
Back
We use RH clustering and it works well, but it is not the most efficient.
You should look into providing those services on top of GFS or something so
you can utilize all of your nodes efficiently.
-- --Original Message-- --
From: taroon-list-bounces@(protected) [mailto:taroon-list-bounces@(protected)]
On Behalf Of Figueiredo, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Subject: Clustering options
I'm looking for some insight from folks working with clustering
of RHEL systems.
My clustering requirements are pretty simple -- I'd like
seamless fail-over or load-balancing of things like sendmail mail
relays, apache instances, DNS resolvers, etc. Most of this stuff could
be accomplished with an IP load-balancer of some sort, probably, but I'm
wondering what the thoughts out there are on things like Redhat Cluster
Suite or Veritas Cluster Server?
Any thoughts welcome, thanks.
-charles.
This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by
replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from
your system. Thank you.
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|