 | | | up2date won 't update openoffice | up2date won 't update openoffice 2005-05-02 - By Chuck Campbell
Back
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:32:38AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> redhat.com?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list>,
> <mailto:taroon-list-request@(protected)?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: taroon-list-bounces@(protected)
> Errors-To: taroon-list-bounces@(protected)
> Content-Length: 1562
> Lines: 39
>
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 10:48 +0300, Jussi Silvennoinen wrote:
> > > I have two machines running RHEL3-U5. Both are dual Opteron, running
> > > 64 bit. Both are entitles. One is WS and one is ES. Both behave
identically
> > > with respect to the information below.
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > redhat-artwork 0.73.2 2E
> > > startup-notification 0.5 1
> > > libmng 1.0.4 3
> > >
> > > file /usr/share/man/man1/bonobo-activation-server.1.gz from install of
bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1 conflicts with file from package bonobo-activation-2
.2.2-1
>
> It looks like a multilib conflict.
>
> Do you see an i386 and x86_64 version of bonobo-activation when you run:
>
> rpm -q bonobo-activation --qf "%{NAME} %{ARCH}\n"
When I do that I see only the bonobo-activation x86_64 one, no .i386
>
> RHN has a bonobo-activation.i386 and a bonobo-activation.x86_64.
>
> You probably only want the x86_64 rpm, so if the i386 rpm shows up, you
> might try rpm -e bonobo-activation.i386, then run up2date again.
Isn't openoffice only .i386? Maybe since I only have the x86_64, openoffice
wants the .i386 version??
>
> Alternately, you could get both bonobo-activation rpms with up2date
> --get, and install them manually with rpm -U --force. They're only
> conflicting over a man page. :)
I'll give this a try.
thanks,
-chuck
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|