 | | | rpmbuild does not fail on missing package | rpmbuild does not fail on missing package 2005-05-13 - By Michael Schwendt
Back
On Thu, 12 May 2005 18:28:01 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> Did the behaviour of rpmbuild change again?
>
> I remember in the past that rpmbuild (or it may have been back in
> the days of rpm -b) would file to build the rpms I was trying to
> build because there were files in the buildroot that were not in
> the specfile. This was actually quite useful to me.
>
> I just built a set of rpms and was surprised that one in
> particular did build when it shouldn't have since a file was
> missing from the specfile.
>
> Does anyone know if that is a bug or a feature change?
>
> (Currently running rpm-build 4.2.3-13)
If I want that behaviour, I define
%_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
in my ~/.rpmmacros. But else I get build failures. You could try to define
the opposite (i.e. 1) and see what you get.
--
Fedora Core release 3.91 (Pre-FC4) - Linux 2.6.11-1.1290_FC4
loadavg: 0.04 0.07 0.21
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|