 | | | Taroon-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 28 | Taroon-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 28 2005-05-18 - By Stephen Gardner
Back
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Cannon, Andrew wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> We have run the following commands as suggested:
>
> ll /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1430464 Jun 8 2003
> /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1
>
> ldconfig -X -N -p |grep -e libg[td]k-
> libgtk-1.2.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so
> libgdk-1.2.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgdk-1.2.so.0
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
> libgdk-x11-2.0.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so
>
> The file is definitely there!
>
> Now we are at a loss. The file is there, but the Netscape installer doesn't
> see the file. We need to use Netscape because one of the programs we are
> using requires Netscape for some functionality. Mozilla and Firefox won't
> do apparently...
>
> Any more ideas? We've tried to link to the 32 bit applications, but there
> is not change in the installer behaviour.
Andrew,
Looks like you've got just the x86_64 versions of the gtk / gdk
libraries installed. All of the other libraries you had from the output of
ldd on the netscape-installer were 32-bit libraries and the linker isn't
going to mix and match 64 and 32-bit libraries. You'll need the i386
architecture version of the gtk+ package installed to provide you with the
32-bit versions of the libraries. The x86_64 RHEL3 distribution ships with
both x86_64 and i386 builds of gtk+. The current versions (listed in
the RHN RHEL3 x86_64 channel) are
gtk+-1.2.10-31:1.i386
gtk+-1.2.10-31:1.x86_64
Regards,
Stephen
> Andrew
>>
>> Andrew,
>> You performed an "ll /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0" which showed a symlink
>> to libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1. However in your next command you referred to the
>> /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1 file directly.. but we haven't yet seen
>> that the /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1 exists. Admittedly you might
>> be able to tell this from the ll output colour. What does
>> ll /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0.9.1 show? It's plausible that the
>> /usr/lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0 symlink is an orphan and the file it points to
>> doesn't exist. It might be worth a look at the output from
>> ldconfig -X -N -p |grep -e libg[td]k- which will display the
>> relevant entries from the dynamic linker cache.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stephen
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|