Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
system down - can 't find luns (correction)

system down - can 't find luns (correction)

2005-05-23       - By Dana Holland

 Back
Reply:     <<     11     12     13     14     15     16     17  

> The purpose of the labels is to ensure that this doesn't happen - the
> label can be anything and does not have to match the device name.  In
> your case, a more useful label would be something like bbls.  So you
> could have:
> # e2label /dev/sda1 bbls
> and in your fstab have:
> LABEL=bbls /usr/local/bbls ...

Is this something that's different on AS 2.1 from 7.3 (which is what the
server was on before)?  The reason I ask is because I've never been
bitten by this before.

I ran the e2label command on both filesystems.  Since we have it back up
and running I can't risk a reboot right now to test it.  And I can't
tell any difference looking at /etc/fstab.  But I'm going to assume it
worked since there were no error messages.


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.