 | | | system down - can 't find luns (correction) | system down - can 't find luns (correction) 2005-05-23 - By Ed Wilts
Back
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:18:11PM -0500, Dana Holland wrote:
> >The purpose of the labels is to ensure that this doesn't happen - the
> >label can be anything and does not have to match the device name. In
> >your case, a more useful label would be something like bbls. So you
> >could have:
> ># e2label /dev/sda1 bbls
> >and in your fstab have:
> >LABEL=bbls /usr/local/bbls ...
>
> Is this something that's different on AS 2.1 from 7.3 (which is what the
> server was on before)? The reason I ask is because I've never been
> bitten by this before.
Both have been around for quite a while and I think that labeling
predated both of them.
> I ran the e2label command on both filesystems. Since we have it back up
> and running I can't risk a reboot right now to test it. And I can't
> tell any difference looking at /etc/fstab. But I'm going to assume it
> worked since there were no error messages.
No news is good news but you can verify the labels on your disk by
running e2label without a new label, for example:
[ewilts@(protected) ewilts]$ sudo e2label /dev/hda1
/boot
--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@(protected)
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@(protected)?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|