Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Kernel file system support under RHEL

Kernel file system support under RHEL

2005-06-20       - By Chiu, PCM (Peter)

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7  

I sent the following post, but suspect it didn't reach the list, so try
it again.


We have just recently acquired a few 24 x 400GB SATA servers with 3Com
9500S-12 controllers.  The 24 drives are configured into 2 x Raid 5 sets
with the 9500S controllers, so each RAID set should have a capacity of
4TB.

Under RHEL AS 3 update 3, the RAIDs are recognised as sda and sdb
devices with 2TB capacity each, as opposed to 4.

If I then mount RHEL AS 4, "fdisk -l" shows sda and sdb being 4TB each,
but mke2fs -j /dev/sda or sdb will only make a 1.8GB file system on each
device. (1.8GB is not a typing mistake.)

I tried to check the kernel with make menuconfig, but I cannot find a
suitable option to specify a larger file system.

Is this an oversight or a bug?
The feature page on RedHat clearly states the support of 8TB under RHEL
AS 4. Did try to check RedHat knowledge database and bugzilla but cannot
locate any reference.

By the way, the processors are dual AMD 248 with 4GB RAM, and I did
select the x86-64 versions of the RHEL.

Any suggestion?  

Thanks.



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>Kernel file system support under RHEL</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I sent the following post, but suspect it didn't
reach the list, so try it again.</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">We have just recently acquired a few 24 x
400GB SATA servers with 3Com 9500S-12 controllers.&nbsp; The 24 drives are
configured into 2 x Raid 5 sets with the 9500S controllers, so each RAID set
should have a capacity of 4TB.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">Under RHEL AS 3 update 3, the RAIDs are
recognised as sda and sdb devices with 2TB capacity each, as opposed to 4.<
/FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">If I then mount RHEL AS 4, &quot;fdisk -l
&quot; shows sda and sdb being 4TB each, but mke2fs -j /dev/sda or sdb will only
make a 1.8GB file system on each device. (1.8GB is not a typing mistake.)</FONT
></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">I tried to check the kernel with make
menuconfig, but I cannot find a suitable option to specify a larger file system
.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">Is this an oversight or a bug? </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">The feature page on RedHat clearly states
the support of 8TB under RHEL AS 4. Did try to check RedHat knowledge database
and bugzilla but cannot locate any reference.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">By the way, the processors are dual AMD 248
with 4GB RAM, and I did select the x86-64 versions of the RHEL.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">Any suggestion?&nbsp; </FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Courier New">Thanks.</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.