 | | | RHEL + SAN feedback | RHEL + SAN feedback 2005-07-10 - By Rafael Ferreira
Back
You should also consider RAC on NFS. I know it may sound crazy at first but
do your homework and you will see that it is the most cost effective
solution... and everyone that is doing large scale RAC is using it... I've
done RAC on a multitude of SAN combinations and trust me NFS will give you
the least headaches with HBA/Fibre.
- raf
-- --Original Message-- --
From: taroon-list-bounces@(protected) [mailto:taroon-list-bounces@(protected)]
On Behalf Of wolf2k5
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 6:51 AM
To: tobias@(protected); Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Cc: EL4 List; General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: Re: RHEL + SAN feedback
On 6/27/05, Tobias Speckbacher <tspeckbacher@(protected)> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We are currently evaluating the implementation of a SAN to work in
> conjunction with an Oracle 10gR2 RAC. The host OS will be RHES 3 or 4.
> The hba's of choice are going to be QLogic cards.
>
> The SAN products we have narrowed our choice down to are the HP EVA-6000
> and the EMC Cx500.
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, did you consider an iSCSI SAN?
If so, why did you got with the FC one?
Thanks.
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.
|
|
|